The Consequences Of Elon Student's Ban On Chick-fil-A

  

Actions Have Consequences: The recent vote to oust Chick-fil-A from the Elon University campus (see Student Vote WRAL) demonstrates the total failure and breakdown of the nations system of higher education.  It is clear that they possess absolutely no in-depth understanding of the nature and reality of gender -- or the higher purpose of the opposite sex relationship.   Which is why they are intellectually and spiritually flat-lined -- and while they think in their own minds that they are intelligent, what they are is pseudo-intellectuals who make their own standards and rules that give them the illusion of intelligence.   The fact that they lack even the minimal intellect to recognize that when they censor or promote one side of an argument, while blindly promoting its opposite -- censoring and suppressing one side of the equation, while affirming its opposite -- without understanding the consequences of the position being  promoted -- in their pseudo-intellectual self-created world in which they dwell, their censorship must be seen as the absolute suspension of reason and intellect.  And yet, this is exactly the case in point with respect to the Elon student bodies attempt to have Chick-fil-A removed from the university campus because the CEO affirms the position of the Biblical definition of Marriage as a Spiritual Union of Opposites.  They are pseudo-intellectuals -- the Taliban of political correctness -- attempting to censor a polarity of mind and thinking that they lack the perceptive intellect to understand -- promoting an Inquisition for the purpose of suppressing all opposing positions other than their own. 

Building off the article entitled The Chicken War - Gay Marriage - Choices Have Consequences!, the question that students walking the path of intellectual pursuits should be asking is: What is the consequences of one's choices?  In the first place the person of intellect would want to know why the Bible rejects homosexuality?   Is there an important reason?   And if there is an important reason for the condemnation of homosexuality, did the biblical authors possess the means to make and in-depth explanation necessary to convey this reason?  Or, because of the immaturity of the people, were they forced to create a list of do's and don't's that will sufice to get the people through the elementary stages of intellectual and spiritual immaturity.   

In the same way that a parent is limited by the maturity of their child with respect to the child's ability to understand the consequences of certain actions, in many instances the parent is limited to enforcing a list of guidelines that must be followed.   Often, because of the immaturity of the child, the parent is limited to telling their child: Just Say No!  Not because the parent wants to dictate unreasonable positions to the child -- but rather, because the child's stage of development does not permit an in-depth explanation of realities which the child's state of immaturity does not permit them to intelligently contemplate at that age.

The question is: Why does the Bible prohibit homosexuality?  The fact that there is an important reason why such a biblical prohibition exists -- and that students and critics of the Bible fail to even understand why this prohibition was made -- is in and of itself the outcome of the Church's long attempt to promote blind faith while outlawing Spiritual Knowledge.   Resulting in the fact that while the Church should be able to intelligently explain the reasons why the Bible prohibits homosexuality, because of the consequences of the Church's own long history of the suppression and censorship of the voice of Spiritual Christians -- while actively promoting blind faith and the ritualization of the Gospel -- has undermined the whole foundation of the original Gospel objectives -- which is the mental development and spiritual enlightenment of the believer (see The Heightening And Expansion Of Mind).  

In the pre-Nicene Church (325AD) there existed a body of mature Christians who could easily explain not only why the Bible rejects homosexuality -- but could also explain all other concepts presented in the Gospel.   These early Christians never relied upon (blind) faith, because they possessed sure Spiritual Knowledge.  This enlightened core of Spiritual Christians understood that God is the most Rational and Intelligent Force in all of Creation -- that there is a reason, a causal factor, and even a higher purpose for all events that transpire in this world -- and these Spiritually Mature Christians knew and comprehended all important reasons for every concept set forth in the Gospel teachings.   But this enlightened intellect of the core body of Spiritual Christians presented a serious threat to the political leaders, and they were hunted down as heretics and murdered.

A wise man knows that history perpetually repeats itself -- and in the same way that it was said of Mao's Cultural Revolution that "Many intellectuals were sent to rural labour camps, and many of those who survived left China shortly after the revolution ended. Many survivors and observers suggest that almost anyone with skills over that of the average person was made the target of political 'struggle' in some way".   In much the same way the Nicene Church was taken over by Pagan Rome, and the whole body of Spiritually Mature Christians were hunted down as heretics in order to silence all opposition to Imperial Rule over the Church and its acceptable doctrines of belief (see Atheists Never Exposed To Original Gospel Teachings).   To the degree that neither the faith-based body of believers, or their non-believing critics, have any idea that one of the primary objectives of the Original Gospel Teachings is as a true System Of Education And Enlightenment.    To the degree that from the perspective of man's higher reality, his present systems of education do more to inhibit genuine knowledge and the development of man's intellect, than to nurture and foster man's ultimate intellectual development and spirituality maturity.

There is a Divine Pattern of Creation -- a Divine Design within which all things have their place -- and the polarity of opposites which is portrayed in the concept of Mother/Father God, remains valid and true in man and woman, and embodies all things right down to the atomic structure of negatively charged electrons and positively charged protons.    

In the manner of those who are victims of Stockholm Syndrome, because of the government intrusion into the Church and its doctrines of belief -- along with the suppression of important original teachings -- the Church today is a mere shadow of its original illustrious manifest reality.  





What is not at all understood today is the fact that the biblical prohibition against homosexuality




  

 

 

 

 

The Chicken War - Gay Marriage - Choices Have Consequences!

The Question? Why Is Homosexuality Condemned In The Bible? Adultery? Fornication?

The latest skirmish in the nation’s culture wars began when Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy told the Baptist Press that the company was “guilty as charged” for backing “the biblical definition of a family” (see Culture War Flares).   But the most important element in the equation is missing -- i.e., why does the Bible condemn homosexuality?  Not to know the answer to this question is to make one's self a victim of blind choice.   What is the consequence of the homosexual lifestyle?  And on a related note, what is the consequence of the abandonment of biblical morality from a modern cultural perspective?

The Warning Of The Apostle: If it is true that there are higher realities of being that are totally inconceivable to the mind of the undeveloped faith-based believer (see Mysteries Of The Gospel) -- and by virtue of their immaturity, the biblical authors were powerless to explain in detail many of the important Gospel teachings and concepts -- then the spiritually mature author's of the scriptures who were themselves enlightened to these higher realities, remained virtually powerless to do anything more than to provide the people with a list of do's and don'ts, so that they are better able to evolve to a mature understanding and comprehension of the teachings of Jesus and TheWay.   To totally ignore these do's and don'ts, without knowing the consequence of one's choices and actions, is paramount to walking out onto a freeway blindfolded. 

I always found it truly amazing that readers of the scriptures could read the words of Paul where he states that the "natural" mind of the Christians who he had himself taught, would reject the truths pertaining to the higher reality of the soul and the Mysteries of the Kingdom as utter "foolishness" -- portraying himself as an "ambassador in bonds" who was unable to speak plainly.   And from this perspective, the best that Paul could do for those who he portrayed as entry-level Christians who were "babes in Christ", was to provide them a series of do's and don'ts that would assist them in evolving through the stages of spiritual immaturity that made it impossible for them to comprehend the True Gospel Meaning and Objectives. 

There are two ultra important possibilities that must be considered -- i.e., the position at least in cultural practice has been advanced by Bishop John Shelby Spong whose side has been portrayed as such: "Although he admits that the Bible is full of statements about sexual virtue, including prohibitions against premarital sex, adultery, and homosexuality, the authors of the Bible were hopelessly uninformed, lacking the benefits of modern research. One author in particular, the Apostle Paul, may have been driven by an inner struggle with his sexual identity" (see Rescuing The Bible).   And the other side is that the biblical authors were not only well informed as to the reason why the scriptures condemned the cultural immorality of hooking-up outside of marriage, but that the facts could not be explained because of the very reasons why Paul warned that the "natural" organic mind of man was too immature to comprehend the higher reality of the soul and man's ultimate spiritual reality which he must discover and manifest within his own life as he seeks to bring about the next stage of birth.    

I use Bishop Spong as an example of man's cultural folly, because I have in the past communicated directly with him (see Reply To Bishop Spong).   I also replied and communicated directly with Bishop Gene Robinson's office on his claim that the condemnation of homosexuality by Paul was based upon a prohibition of hetersexuals from engaging in same sex acts, and not homosexuals (see Reply: Same Sex Acts Unnatural For Heterosexuals) -- with Bishop Robinson making the profoundly ignorant statement that "It never occurred to anyone in ancient times that a certain minority of us would be born being affectionately-oriented to people of the same sex".   And as revealed in my reply to Bishop Robinson, what we are witnessing in the hostility to the position presented in the scriptures, is the result of error begetting even greater error -- and the fact that if you perpetually repeat a lie, that it will come to be accepted as factually true.   

Over the past 1400 years the Church has been in countless ways confronted by the question: Do you believe Jesus and his original disciples?  Or do you believe the dictates of the Roman Emperor Justinian? (see Dictates Of The Emperor)   And when Bishop Spong and Robinson conclude that homosexual behavior is approved by God, they ignore the original teachings that homosexuality is the result of the pre-existent actions of the people themselves (see The Early Church On Predestination).    And that those who are born homosexual, have merely confined themselves to The Prison that Jesus made reference to where the biblical reality is lived out: “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows” (Gal 6:7 NIV).

If Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy and the Baptists were truly mature Christians who had themselves fulfilled the Gospel Objectives, Mr. Cathy would have explained why the Bible condemns our modern culture of immorality.   He would have explained about The Esoteric Reality Of Virginity And Sex -- and he would have enlightened the people about The Holographic Pattern Of Sex that is the basis of the biblical prohibitions and morality that the people in our modern culture find outdated.  And while Bishop Spong would like to believe that "...the authors of the Bible were hopelessly uninformed, lacking the benefits of modern research" -- once The Holographic Pattern Of Sex , is understood, it is easily demonstrated that both bishops as well as our modern culture are representative of the embodiment of absolute ignorance -- and ignorance that is depriving the people of even the opportunity of bringing about the next stage of birth that Jesus taught was necessary to enter into Life in the Kingdom.       

Jesus condemned the Pharisees as heretics -- portraying them as the offspring of the Devil -- for throwing away the Key of Knowledge in their carnal interpretations and misuse of the scriptures.    The reality of the Spiritual Marriage of man and woman being the environment of the Divine Design of Creator-God to bring about the next stage of birth that Jesus portrayed as being necessary to enter into the Kingdom, is presented and explored at Marriage - The Warning Of The Apostle - The Key Of Knowledge.   That both liberal Christians and the far left of our culture would like naive people to believe that the very Divine Design of Creation has somehow been done away with, is the epitome of their own philosophical folly.